Data Element |
Deficiencies |
Office |
- For 5,196 cases, the office that made the criminal referral was not identified.
|
Referral Number |
- For 3,486 cases, a referral number was not used.
|
Referral Date |
- For 524 cases, the referral date was not identified.
|
Referred By |
- For 2,985 cases, the source of the referral was not identified.
- There were 77 different descriptions use to identify the source of the referral such as narrative descriptions, acronyms, and abbreviations.
|
Bankruptcy Number |
- For 1,542 cases, the bankruptcy number was identified.
|
Debtor Name |
- For 1,168 cases, the debtor name was not identified.
|
Chapter |
- For 1,839 cases, the type of chapter filed by the debtor was not identified.
|
Allegations |
- For 358 cases, the type of allegation was not identified.
- To identify the type of allegation, there were 2,005 different descriptions such as narrative descriptions, acronyms, abbreviations and multiple allegations included in the same data field.
|
Loss |
- For 5,472 cases, the loss was not identified.
|
Subject Name |
- For 1,172 cases, the subject of the criminal referral was not identified.
|
Subject Code |
- For 3,465 cases, the subject code was not identified.
- There were 119 different subject codes used because of the inconsistent use of acronyms and abbreviations.
|
AUSA Assigned |
- For 6,148 cases, AUSA assigned to the cases were not identified.
|
Date Declined |
- For 15 cases, the date the criminal referral was declined was not identified.
|
Current Status |
- For 872 cases, the current status was not identified.
- There were 432 different descriptions used to provide the current status. This occurred because of the inconsistent use narrative descriptions, acronyms, and abbreviations.
|
Date Indictment |
- For 18 cases, the date of the indictment date was identified.
|
Indictment Code |
- For 321 cases, the indictment code was not identified.
- There were 238 different indictment codes used to describe type of indictment. This occurred primarily because of the inconsistent use criminal code citations, narrative descriptions, and the number of offenses.
|
Date of Conviction |
- For 15 cases, the conviction date was not identified.
|
Conviction Code |
- For 276 cases, the conviction code was not identified.
- There were 305 different conviction codes. This occurred primarily because of the inconsistent use criminal code citations, narrative descriptions, and the number of offenses.
|
Statute of Limitations |
- For 7,554 cases, the date for the statute of limitations was not identified.
|